CCPHE’s Statement On Governor Newsom’s Signed Budget for 2022-23

The California Coalition for Public Higher Education (CCPHE) thanks Gov. Gavin Newsom and the State Legislature for providing the highest level of funding that California’s public higher education system has received in many years. While there is still work to be done to make up for past losses and future investment needs, the 2022-23 state budget and the commitment to increases in future years are important investments in our state’s promising future.

– The California Coalition for Public Higher Education

In the LA Times: The UC system needs taxpayers to be more generous and reliable

On August 3, 2021, the Los Angeles Times published this letter to the editor from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education:

As UC Board of Regents Chairwoman Cecilia Estolano said, the future of the state and nation depend on the University of California system expanding its capacity to educate the great leaders of the future.

Expanding UC capacity requires substantial and sustained state investments in facilities and faculty. But California’s public universities don’t have dedicated funding streams or constitutional protections. The state’s current budget provided substantial increases in funding but cannot make up for all the losses over the past several years.

One-time investments are not enough. Sustained and reliable sources of funding are critical to recruiting the new faculty and adding and improving the facilities needed to expand our public university system’s capacity and ensure a stronger future for our state and nation.
 

New letter to the editor: “CSUN gets $40M donation, the largest in school history”

On June 20 and 21, 2021, Southern California News Group published this letter to the editor from Dan Chernow, president of the CSU Northridge Alumni Association and executive director of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education – Education Fund in response to their article, “CSUN gets $40M donation, the largest in school history”:

MacKenzie Scott’s incredibly generous donations to 12 CSU campuses and the California Community Colleges speaks to their vital role in preparing all our young people for a changing economy. Producing skilled workers is critical to America’s future and its ability to secure prosperity and broaden economic opportunity for all, including those who are under-represented.

As CSU Northridge Alumni Association president and California Coalition for Public Higher Education education executive director, I wish to express appreciation and thanks for recognizing the role public higher education plays in pursuing social justice.

I also wish to remind our lawmakers that continued financial support is needed for all the state’s public higher education institutions. While the budget the legislature approved this week also helps to close the gap, sustained support is needed to fulfill the promise of success that public higher education holds for people from all walks of life.

Read the letter to the editor on the Daily News website.

New op-ed: California’s public higher ed system shaping nation’s leaders

On April 16, 2021, CalMatters published the following op-ed from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education, titled, “California’s public higher ed system shaping nation’s leaders.“

The election of Vice President Kamala Harris and the appointment of several Californians to top posts in the new administration signal not only the state’s renewed clout in the nation’s capital but also the influential role our world-class public higher education system plays in shaping leaders and expanding diversity at the upper echelons of government.

Harris, a graduate of the University of California, Hastings College of Law, is the nation’s first woman, first person of color and first UC-affiliated person to ever hold the vice presidency. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, a UC Berkeley professor emeritus, is the first woman to hold that powerful position, and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas graduated from UC Berkeley and is the first Latino and immigrant leader of the Department of Homeland Security.


These appointments and others underscore how California’s public higher education system creates strong and diverse leaders and helps combat economic and social inequities. But leaders at UC, California State University  and California Community Colleges recognize they need to do more to increase diversity among faculty, staff and the student population. Each is moving forward with initiatives to achieve these goals, and Gov. Gavin Newsom’s budget proposal to increase funding for these initiatives deserves the Legislature’s support.

Among these initiatives, California Community Colleges, the state’s primary entry point into collegiate degree programs, has already met its 2022 goal of a 20% increase in students receiving credentials, and it is narrowing the achievement gap for students of color. California Community Colleges also is increasing flexibility in its courses, credit and support to meet the needs of an older and increasingly diverse student population. And it’s working to help struggling students secure housing and food, so they can focus on learning and reaching their goals.

CSU Board of Trustees and UC Board of Regents have developed multi-year plans to eliminate achievement gaps, with CSU seeking to eliminate gaps by 2025 and UC by 2030. Graduation rates at CSU, one of the nation’s largest and most diverse public universities, are at an all-time high, granting 62% of all bachelor’s degrees earned by California’s Latinx students and 47% of all bachelor’s degrees earned by the state’s Black students.

For the fall 2020 semester, UC enrolled more Latinx students than before and increased the admissions of low-income and first-generation-to-college students. The trend is continuing. UC reports a record number of undergraduate applications for the upcoming fall semester, a surge in applications from Latinx and Black students applications and continued growth in California Community Colleges transfer applications.

The governor’s budget proposal would continue these gains by providing state funding to CCC, CSU and UC to help close equity gaps, promote completion, fuel innovation and support students’ upward economic mobility. A recent agreement with legislative leaders would also restore previously enacted reductions, effective July 1, for UC and CSU. And the governor’s proposal assumes no increase in tuition and fees in 2021-22.

While the budget proposal won’t make up for all the funding losses over the past several years at the state’s colleges and universities, it will help them continue to provide the ladders to success for students from backgrounds and train the diverse leaders we need.

Over the past year, the U.S. has faced a long overdue reckoning of the racial and economic divides that persist in our nation. This moment in time demands urgent action to achieve equity in higher education to give students from all walks of life equal access and opportunities. Now is not the time to falter or fail. Now is the time to invest in all our young people.

_____

Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine have also written about how public universities and colleges can serve as economic engines, how the state’s economic recovery depends on investing in California higher education and how federal investments are needed for the state’s higher education system in the fight against COVID-19.

New op-ed: UC Nobel winners underscore value of investments in higher education

On October 14, 2020, the San Francisco Chronicle published this op-ed from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education, titled, “UC Nobel winners underscore value of investments in higher education“:

The awarding of the Nobel Prizes to three University of California faculty members this month underscores the importance of the state’s world-class public higher education system to advancing the pace of discovery and innovation that fuels economic growth and improves lives.

UC Berkeley biochemist Jennifer Doudna shared the 2020 Nobel Prize in chemistry with colleague Emmanuelle Charpentier for the co-development of CRISPR-Cas9, a genome editing breakthrough that has revolutionized biomedicine.

This technology allows scientists to rewrite DNA — the code of life — in any organism, including human cells. It has opened the door to treatments for thousands of diseases as well as new possibilities across biology and agriculture.

UC Berkeley Professor emeritus Reinhard Genzel and UCLA Professor Andrea Ghez shared half of the 2020 Nobel Prize in physics for “the discovery of a supermassive compact object at the centre of our galaxy.”

They join a proud legacy of the UC system winning Nobel Prizes that stretches back to 1939 and includes 68 faculty and staff who have been awarded 69 Nobel Prizes. Their discoveries have advanced medicine, economics, physics and more, powering innovations that improve lives and strengthen the state’s and the nation’s economy.

To support them and help invigorate the economy, the state and federal government must continue to invest in California’s world-class public higher education system. The strength of the state’s economy will be critical to the nation’s recovery from the coronavirus downtown because California accounts for nearly 15% of the nation’s gross domestic product. The state’s public higher education system is critical to California’s economy. The UC system alone is the state’s third-largest employer and, along with the CSU, contributes over $60 billion to California’s economy every year.

As the world’s largest public research university system, UC is also responsible for sparking statewide innovation, with an average of five inventions per day. CSU is essential to the state’s workforce. One in every 10 employees in California is a graduate of CSU, and more than half of its alumni stay in California.

Yet California’s per-student funding is still far behind where it was in the mid-1970s, and that has driven up tuition, reduced course offerings, caused faculty to leave and increased time to graduation.

Now COVID-19 is ravaging public higher education’s finances. Responding to the pandemic has driven up costs as instruction shifted online and reduced income from dorms, dining and other “enterprise” programs. The state budget also cut $970 million from UC and CSU budgets.

Most of that could be restored with federal coronavirus assistance, but that funding has not yet been approved. A recent UCLA economic forecast said the relief package is critical to the state’s recovery. The UCLA economists predicted that a full recovery from the coronavirus downturn will take more than two years but said that estimate is overly optimistic if Congress fails to allocate at least $1 trillion in fiscal stimulus before the end of the year.

As graduates of the UC system, we know the difference public higher education makes in the lives of students every day, and we see the importance of investing in it to strengthen the state’s economy and help us recover from the pandemic downturn.

We call on our state’s elected leaders to provide the needed funds to public higher education to continue to train and equip our future leaders and to support the research enterprise that has produced Nobel Prize-winning results. By doing so, we can continue to advance the pace of discoveries and innovations that improve both the personal health and the economic health of our state and our nation.

See the op-ed on the San Francisco Chronicle website.

New Op-Ed: Make up for COVID-19 losses by investing in California higher education

On June 13, 2020, CalMatters published an op-ed from Fund Higher Ed co-chairs Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine titled “Make up for COVID-19 losses by investing in California higher education; state’s economic recovery depends on it.” Here’s an excerpt:

As the COVID-19 pandemic spread across California, the state’s public universities and colleges transitioned from bustling campuses to virtually empty ones – sending their costs soaring and revenues spiraling.

University of California and California State University systems reported losses totaling more than $1.4 billion since the outbreak, mostly from the increased costs of online instruction and lost revenues from shuttered dorms, dining halls and other programs. California Community Colleges estimate they will lose $1 billion over the next year.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, faced with a $54 billion budget deficit, proposed a 10% cut in public higher education funding in his May budget proposal. The Legislature is considering a budget next week that will replace most of the higher education funds the governor cut. But the Legislature’s replacement funding is contingent upon the state getting billions in federal funds to offset its COVID-19 revenue losses.

Failure to get those federal funds and any further reductions in public higher education threaten to rob a vital engine of the state’s economy of the fuel it needs to help California overcome the pandemic’s economic devastation. The state’s public higher education system is a key driver of the state’s economic success and essential to its ability to respond to COVID-19 and future pandemics, as well as other disasters.

The op-ed continues:

From 2008 to 2012, state investments in public higher education plummeted, leading UC and CSU to double tuition, lay off and furlough staff and defer new construction and maintenance. California’s Community Colleges also sustained $1.5 billion in funding reductions, which resulted in about 600,000 students losing access to higher education.

State leaders had sought to restore funding in recent years. But California’s per-student funding is still far behind where it was in the mid-1970s. At the same time, California is estimated to be about 1 million college graduates short of what state employers will need over the next decade – if it doesn’t produce more college graduates.

Now, with COVID-19 ravaging their finances, UC reports it lost $1.1 billion in March and April alone. CSU, which has lost $337 million already from COVID-19, recently announced that most of its fall semester classes will be online, meaning more losses of revenue from dorms, dining and its other “enterprise” programs. UCs and Community Colleges may be mostly online as well.

When California adopted the Master Plan for Education in 1960, it made a promise to make higher education accessible to all. The state is at risk of breaking that promise, if it cannot provide the revenues to make up for the devastating financial losses COVID-19 is creating in our state’s public higher education system. The state’s recovery from COVID-19’s economic destruction will also be slower, and the future health of Californians will be at greater risk.

As alumni of our state’s public higher education system, we call on our leaders to invest in California’s future by investing in its world-class institutions of higher education. Doing so will keep public higher education accessible to Californians looking to improve their economic well-being. It will hasten our state’s recovery, and it will ensure we are ready to respond to future pandemics and disasters.

Read the complete op-ed on the CalMatters website.

Higher Education Coalition Leaders Laud Newsom Budget Proposal

Newly elected Governor Gavin Newsom has released his initial Budget proposal for the 2019-20 fiscal year.  Higher ed fared better in the Newsom proposal than it did in previous years.

Budget Response from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine—Co-chairs California Coalition for Public Higher Education:

“Governor Newsom should be congratulated for a constructive 2019-2020 Budget proposal that restores higher education as a State priority,” commented Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education.  “The University of California, California State University and our community colleges will have additional resources to maintain quality, expand access and ease the cost burden on students and their families.”

All three segments of the public higher education system will receive additional funds: 

  •  The University of California will receive a $240 million increase (6.9%) in operating funds, plus an additional one-time outlay of $153 million, primarily for deferred maintenance.
  • California State University will receive a $318 million increase (8%) for operations plus a one-time allocation of $264 million.
  • California community colleges are slated to receive an added $401 million.  The State would now cover two full years of free community college.

Video: Higher Education as a Driver of Economic Mobility

At a Sacramento briefing on December 13, 2018, Public Policy Institute of California researcher Sarah Bohn outlined key findings of a new PPIC report.

Higher education plays a key role in helping Californians move up the income ladder—but equity gaps are a big challenge. Among young adults born in California, 60% of Asian Americans and 40% of whites have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared to 21% of African Americans and 18% of Latinos.

The state needs to build on recent improvements in college access and completion so that more Californians—particularly underrepresented students—can benefit from higher education. 

Californians want more funding for public higher education, survey shows

On Nov. 14, 2018, LA Times published an article titled, “Californians want more funding for public higher education, survey shows.” Here’s an excerpt:

Most Californians believe higher education should be a top priority for the new governor and support increased funding for public colleges and universities, according to a new survey by the Public Policy Institute of California.

As the state’s public higher education system struggles to recover from major funding cuts a decade ago, the majority of Californians surveyed by the institute supported giving the schools a wide range of help. Most backed free community college, a statewide bond for university construction projects, a minimum state funding guarantee and even reform of Prop. 13 to raise more money by loosening restrictions on taxing commercial properties.

The article continues:

The biggest problem facing college students today, most of those surveyed said — above educational quality and admissions access — is the cost. Most were concerned that students were taking on too much debt, and more than one-third of those surveyed said housing and living expenses were a greater financial burden than tuition. (Financial aid covers tuition for the majority of students at UC and Cal State.) …

The University of California and California State University both are requesting more state funding for 2019-20 to avoid tuition hikes and expand enrollment, provide more student support, pay for faculty and staff raises and repair aging buildings. Despite recent funding increases, the state’s share of per-student support at UC has dropped from 78% in 1990 to 37% in 2017.

Read the complete article on the LA Times website.

UC campuses earn top spots on US News & World Report’s Best Colleges list

On September 10, 2018, the University of California issued a press release titled, “UC campuses earn top spots on US News & World Report’s Best Colleges list”:

University of California campuses scored half of the top 10 spots for the best public undergraduate education in the nation on the U.S. News & World Report’s 2019 Best Colleges rankings released today (Sept. 10).

UCLA and UC Berkeley took the first and second spots, respectively, while UC Santa Barbara came in fifth. UC Irvine was No. 7, UC Davis was No. 10 and UC San Diego took the 12th spot this year. UC Santa Cruz (No. 26), UC Riverside (No. 35) and UC Merced (No. 67) rounded out the rankings.

The U.S. News & World Report ranks universities each fall to help inform prospective students’ decisions on where to apply, taking into account academic reputation, financial resources and selectivity in admissions.

This year, the magazine changed its methodology to better reflect social mobility in its overall rankings for both public and private universities. As a result, most UC campuses saw a significant rise in their standings. UC Riverside had the biggest improvement of any university nationwide, vaulting to No. 85 from No. 124, while UC Merced jumped to No. 136, up 29 spots.

Learn more about UC’s excellence in these and other rankings here.

New Op-Ed: Higher Education is Key to California Economy

On August 27, 2018, The Los Angeles Business Journal published an op-ed from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education, titled, “Higher Education is Key to California Economy”:

By Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine

Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine co-chair the California Coalition for Public Higher Education. Ackerman is a former California State Senator and Assemblyman, and Levine is a former U.S. Congressman and State Assemblyman

California continues to flourish and higher education is the secret sauce that nourishes the state’s economy.  Our world class academic institutions are at the center of the innovation, creativity, technological advances and biomedical breakthroughs that make California a national and international pacesetter. It is no wonder that the Golden State has the world’s fifth largest economy.

The backbone of California’s “brainpower advantage” is the state’s unmatched public higher education system that encompasses the University of California, California State University and  a statewide network of community colleges.  The challenge is to keep this system on top of its game, while competing with other State priorities.

The case for investment in public higher education is strong.  California community colleges are the largest provider of workforce training in the nation.  CSU is the largest source of the state’s diverse workforce.  For every dollar California invests in students who graduate from college, there is a $4.50 return on that investment.

In addition to its vital role in educating the scientists, engineers, physicians, educators, business executives and other professional and cultural leaders, the University of California is a research enterprise that is second to none.  UC has produced more than 1800 inventions.  There are more than 10,000 active patents based on UC research and more than a thousand new companies have been founded as a result of UC patents.  From critical medical advances to new horizons for agriculture, UC is contributing mightily to California’s economy and to the health and well-being of millions around the world.

Much of the success of UC, CSU and the community colleges flows from the wisdom of State leaders who had the vision to invest in building the world’s best public higher education system. But as the State has faced major fiscal challenges over the years, Sacramento’s commitment to higher education faltered. Per student State support for UC and CSU remain dramatically lower than it was two decades ago. This has forced tuition increases and handicapped the systems’ ability to accommodate qualified students.  Fortunately, that tide has begun to turn.  Per student State funding for community colleges is now at an all time high and recent State Budgets have begun to restore funding for UC and CSU.

Higher education funding, however, is nowhere near where it needs to be.  The Public Policy Institute of California has project that the California workforce will need more than a million additional college graduates within a decade.  More and more, productive careers depend on education beyond high school.  College graduate earn hundreds of thousands of dollars more during their careers than high school graduates.  Higher education is key to opportunity and to maintaining a dynamic economy.

In many respects public higher education is at a turning point in California.  With a new Governor, there will be a fresh opportunity to address the state’s commitment to higher education and to construct a long-term funding mechanism that will sustain and grow the system’s ability to serve the young Californians who are the state’s future and to serve as the linchpin of California’s economic success.

Given the programs and interests that will compete for every Budget dollar, it is imperative that those who recognize the vital role of higher education step up to the plate and advocate for making higher education a top State priority.  That particularly includes the business community that must make this issue front and center.

 

New Op-Ed: Budget Deal Leaves Higher Education Short

On June 15, 2018, Fox & Hounds published an op-ed from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education, titled, “Budget Deal Leaves Higher Education Short.” Here’s an excerpt:

For a few days, it appeared that Sacramento’s budget-makers were on the right track, but the final Budget numbers once again fall short when it comes to higher education funding. The Joint Legislative Budget Conference Committee had approved the modest “full funding” requests to enable campuses to increase enrollment and avoid further tuition increases. But that decision didn’t survive the chopping block when Governor Jerry Brown and Legislative leaders hammered out a final Budget deal—leaving UC support basically flat and providing CSU with only a limited boost over the Governor’s May proposal. What additional monies that were provided relied primarily on one-time funding rather than ongoing support. How can campuses admit four-year students with only one-year funding?

The op-ed continues:

The Governor has stressed the importance of having a robust “rainy day” fund to prepare for a downturn in the economy. Well, UC and CSU have been experiencing more than two decades of rainy days. Per student State support for UC has been cut in half and per student State funding for CSU is down more than a quarter. All the while, student enrollment has continued to increase and applications are setting records. It is not enough that recent budgets have stopped siphoning off higher education funding and provided some fiscal relief for both UC and CSU. The time has come to reinvest in higher education for the sake of California’s future.

Read the complete op-ed on the Fox & Hounds website.

California’s online community college will break new ground in higher ed

On Aug. 2, 2018, EdSource published an article titled, “California’s online community college will break new ground in higher ed.” Here’s an excerpt:

California’s online community college will represent a new vision for higher education when it launches next year and the online education field is watching to see whether it succeeds.

The new fully online college draws from a variety of sources, including public universities’ online degree programs, corporate worker training initiatives and programs at for-profit colleges. California plans to blend those existing influences to create something without precedent: A statewide, online-only public college focused on short, career-oriented certificates. …

The online college plans to begin offering courses in the fall of 2019 and is expected to cost $240 million over its first seven years, not counting funding the college will receive for each enrolled student. It will become the 115th institution in the community college system, the largest higher education system in the country. The System’s Board of Governors will meet to discuss the online college on Monday and is expected to take up a motion launching the search for the new institution’s CEO.

Proponents say the online college has the potential to reach a population of Californians who aren’t being served by any of the existing college options either in person or online.

“It is a different way of doing things,” said Lande Ajose, executive director of California Competes, which researches and advocates for strategies to increase the number of people in the state with college credentials. “The hope is that it will both satisfy some very specific and concrete labor market demand issues for individual workers, and potentially excite them about maybe going back to their local community college.”

Read the complete article on EdSource website.

UC Board of Regents approve 2018-19 budget plan with reduced tuition

On July 19, 2018, the University of California issued a press release titled, “UC Board of Regents approve 2018-19 budget plan with reduced tuition”:

The University of California Board of Regents today (July 19) approved the university’s revised 2018-19 budget plan, which reflects increases in state funding, keeps the student service fee at its current level and reduces tuition by $60.

The tuition reduction — from its current $11,502 annually to $11,442 annually — results from the end of a temporary surcharge instituted in fall 2007 to recoup damages from two earlier class-action lawsuits, Kashmiri v. Regents and Luquetta v. Regents. By fall 2018, nearly all of those costs will be fully recovered.

The student services fee will remain at $1,128 a year.

The approved regents item may be accessed here.

The class-action lawsuits, one filed in 2003 and the other in 2007, stemmed from claims made by students at UC’s professional schools that the university raised their tuition without sufficient notice. The university disagreed, but lost both cases on appeal. In total, the litigation process cost the university nearly $100 million.

UC admissions rise, with record surge in transfers

On July 11, 2018, the University of California issued a press release titled, “UC admissions rise, with record surge in transfers”:

The University of California announced today (July 11) that it has offered nearly 137,000 students a spot on at least one of its nine undergraduate campuses this fall, including more than 28,750 transfer applicants, the highest number in the history of the university.

California residents make up the vast majority of those admitted, 71,086 as freshmen and 24,568 as transfer students. Overall, this represents 1,114 more California freshmen and 1,851 more California transfers than were admitted last year. Almost all of the transfers were from the California Community Colleges.

“After reviewing yet another record-breaking number of applications, our campuses have offered admission to an exceptionally talented group of students for the upcoming academic year,” said UC President Janet Napolitano. “With the benefit of a UC education, these accomplished young people from different backgrounds, with diverse beliefs and aspirations, will make California and the world a better place. We look forward to having them at the university.”

More California undergraduates are currently enrolled at UC than at any point in its history, and after last year’s enrollment jump of some 5,000 California students, the university anticipates it will have far surpassed its goal of adding an additional 10,000 Californians by the 2018-19 academic year. Total three-year growth is estimated to be an additional 15,000 California resident undergraduates.

As part of the university’s effort to effectively manage enrollment growth, this year not every campus increased its admissions offers over last year. Based on preliminary reports of students’ intention to register, however, indications are that the number of new California freshman and transfer students who will enroll at UC in the fall, what is known as “yield,” will increase by more than 3,000 over 2017.

In keeping with the recently enacted caps on nonresident enrollment at all of the campuses, 17,863 domestic and 19,069 international freshmen were also offered admission for the fall. Nonresident students typically accept UC admissions offers at a much lower rate than do Californians.

“University admissions is part science, part art and part experience,” said Vice President for Student Affairs Robin Holmes-Sullivan. “High admissions numbers don’t automatically translate to high enrollment. The data we have available today give us great confidence in predicting that our actual fall enrollment will exceed our goal. We are gratified that so many of these top-notch, motivated students are eager to attend UC.”

The preliminary admissions numbers show increases in offers to students from historically underrepresented groups and among California freshmen and transfers who would be the first in their families to graduate from a four-year college, with first-generation students comprising 46 percent of the total.

Among freshman applicants, Asian American students remained the largest ethnic group admitted at 36 percent, followed by Latinos at 33 percent, whites at 22 percent and African Americans at 5 percent. American Indians, Pacific Islanders and applicants who did not report a race or ethnicity made up the remainder of admitted students.

Admission of California Community College transfer students grew by 8 percent over fall 2017, and is in keeping with UC’s goal of enrolling one new California resident transfer student for every two new California resident freshmen.

UC’s current transfer student enrollment is at an all-time high and will likely continue to grow. UC recently announced a plan to guarantee transfers to a UC campus for students who achieve the requisite GPA and complete one of 21 “pathways,” or prerequisite classes for the most popular UC majors. These guarantees will be in place for students beginning community college in fall 2019.

This year’s proportion of transfer students who were admitted from historically underrepresented groups jumped to 38 percent. Latino students were the largest ethnic group at just under 32 percent, followed closely by white students at 31 percent and Asian Americans at 27 percent. African Americans represented 6 percent of the admitted transfer students, while American Indians and Pacific Islanders made up less than 1 percent of the admitted transfer students.

The preliminary data released today includes applicants admitted from waitlists and through the referral pool. The data tables, which include campus-specific information for both freshmen and transfers, may be accessed here.

New op-ed: Close The Higher Education Funding Gap

On June 6, 2018, Fox & Hounds published an op-ed from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education, titled, “Close The Higher Education Funding Gap.” Here’s an excerpt:

During the past quarter century, enrollment at the University of California and California State University has increased dramatically, while State funding for the campuses has declined precipitously.  That is a formula for disaster—not only for our higher education system and for thousands of aspiring young Californians, but also for the economic health of our state.

A new publication by the California Budget and Policy Center illustrates the problem.  Since 1981-82, UC enrollment at increased by 113%, while State funding per student has declined by 51%.  During the same time period, CSU enrollment grew by 68%, even as per student State funding declined by 26%.  The results of this disconnect are clear—too many qualified California students have been turned away, we have lost top notch faculty and much of the cost burden has been shifted to students and their families in the form of higher tuition and fees.

Fortunately, there has been a growing consensus in the Capitol that this situation has got to change.  Both the State Assembly and Senate versions of the 2018-19 State Budget call for full funding of UC and CSU funding requests to enable both institutions to accommodate more students without further increasing tuition.  Hopefully, the final Budget enacted by the Legislature and signed by Governor Jerry Brown will reflect this level of support for higher education.

Read the complete op-ed on the Fox & Hounds website.

UC helps drive California biotech; don’t disinvest

On June 5, 2018, The East Bay Times published an op-ed from a group of Bay Area biotech company executives titled, “UC helps drive California biotech; don’t disinvest.” Here’s an excerpt:

University of California research innovations have helped Bay Area biotech companies usher in breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy, disease prevention, vaccines, precision medicine and prosthetics while generating high-paying jobs and tax revenues for the Golden State.

And so it’s little wonder that Bay Area biotech leaders – especially those of us who graduated from UC campuses – are closely watching how Gov. Jerry Brown funds California’s top-ranking research university system in the 2018-19 state budget. A lot is at stake.

While we applaud the allocation for UC’s deferred maintenance, the governor’s proposed 3 percent increase falls significantly below what is needed to keep the University of California competitive and, in turn, California’s biotech industry on the cutting edge.

Across UC campuses from Berkeley to San Francisco and from San Diego to Davis, five new inventions, on average, are developed each day. Moreover, research by UC graduate students produce a new startup every two weeks.  At UC Berkeley, our alma mater, hundreds of life sciences majors take up research positions in our firms on the outskirts of the campus. …

For the sake of future generations of UC students and the health of California’s economy, it is critical that Gov. Brown and state legislators support full funding for UC’s 2018 budget request. A 4 percent increase versus the governor’s proposed 3 percent would signal a step towards returning to the level of state support needed to sustain UC’s excellence and affordability.

As CEOs of companies on the frontline of science and medicine, we need the state to continue partnering with the University of California to produce the expert labor force that drives the biotechnology industry in our state.
We urge those who care about the state’s economic growth, and health and social mobility, to call on the governor and legislators to safeguard the University of California’s critical role in the state’s life sciences business ecosystem.

Wendye Robbins, president & CEO of Blade Therapeutics in South San Francisco, co-wrote the op-ed with fellow UC Berkeley graduates Stephen Cary, president and CEO of Omniox; Nathaniel David, co-founder and president of Unity Biotechnology; Stephen Isaacs, chairman, president and CEO of Aduro Biotech; David Kirn, CEO, co-founder and chairman of 4D Molecular Therapeutics; Gail Maderis, president and CEO of Antiva Biosciences; Adam Mendelsohn, president of Nano Precision Medical; and Terry Rosen, CEO of Arcus Biosciences.  Read the complete op-ed on The East Bay Times’ website.

You don’t need to be the head of Google to know what needs to be done about the UC

On May 31, 2018, The Sacramento Bee published an op-ed from Eric Schmidt, former executive chair of Google and a member of the UC Berkeley Board of Visitors, titled, “You don’t need to be the head of Google to know what needs to be done about the UC.” Here’s an excerpt:

While our socioeconomic well-being depends on a vibrant private sector, make no mistake, the strength of that sector is supported in profound ways by all that public higher education has to offer. And I feel that California owes it to ourselves to make sure that its institutions of higher learning remain places of immense promise and unlimited potential for students who will shape our state, and our economy, well into the future.

Today, the UC system educates about 90,000 more students than it did in the year 2000 with the same level of state funding. On a per-student basis, state support for the UC has plummeted from $19,100 per student to $7,500 in the 2016-17 academic year, even as the university has been compelled to admit a growing number of students. You don’t need to be a business executive to realize that is unsustainable.

California’s higher education system has long been one of the strongest and most accessible in the U.S. The UC is also known as a world-class incubator of discovery and innovation, generating more patents than any other university in the nation. It’s in UC’s DNA, from the very beginning. …

The investment of public funds in public universities has paid Californians back many times over. In fact, study after study shows that when it comes to public spending there is no better investment than higher education, with every dollar spent generating as much as seven dollars for the state’s coffers.

There’s a moral bottom line, as well. Budgets are moral documents – they reveal our true values. Putting more resources into higher education, sustaining what the state’s founders started, is not only an economic no-brainer – it’s the right thing to do.

Read the complete op-ed on The Sacramento Bee’s  website.

New Analyses Show Decades of Decline in Direct State Support for CSU and UC

This May, The California Budget & Policy Center published a report: “New Analyses Show Decades of Decline in Direct State Support for CSU and UC.”  Here’s an excerpt:

California’s public university systems — the California State University (CSU) and University of California (UC) — have seen substantial increases in enrollment since the early 1980s and currently educate a total of nearly 700,000 students. However, a pair of Data Hits from Budget Center Policy Analyst Amy Rose shows that even as their student populations have grown, direct state investment in CSU and UC has declined significantly. State funding for higher education is expected to be among the key issues for deliberation as legislators and Governor Brown work to finalize a new state budget in the coming weeks.

Read the analysis on The California Budget & Policy Center website for:

 LEGISLATURE MOVES TO AUGMENT HIGHER ED FUNDING

Both the State Assembly and Senate Budget Committees have voted to provide significant new funding for the University of California and California State University in the 2018-19 Budget.   The committee actions provided more than $100 million for UC above the Governor’s budget proposal and more than $200 million in additional funding for CSU.  Strong funding for California’s community colleges is also part of the emerging budget package.

“The Legislature is moving to recommit California to public higher education,” commented Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, Co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education.  “This is a major step toward strengthening both UC and CSU and opening the doors wider to deserving young Californians.  The Administration’s budget proposal for higher education was clearly inadequate and it is gratifying that legislators on both sides of the aisle have recognized the need.”

Students, faculty, parents, alumni and community leaders have rallied to the cause of full funding for UC and CSU.  In the Legislature, Assembly Budget Chair Jose Medina and Senators Steve Glazer and Ben Allen have led the charge.

The next step in the Budget process will be adoption of Budget versions by both the Assembly and Senate and then conference committee negotiations for a final package to be approved by both houses of the Legislature.  The final Budget negotiations will involve the Governor, as well as the Legislative leadership.  The deadline for passage of the 2018-19 Budget is June 15.

Rally at the State Capitol calls on Governor Brown to fully fund public higher ed

On May 16, 2018, Assemblymember Jose Medina (D-Riverside) hosted a rally at the State Capitol to call on Governor Brown to fully fund the University of California and California State University systems. Watch as Assemblymember Medina, UC and CSU students, the California Labor Federation and the California Faculty Association fight for California’s universities.

 

California Stands to Lose Billions in Future Economic Returns by Continuing to Underfund CSU and UC, Study Finds

On May 9, 2018, The California Budget & Policy Center published a report, “California Stands to Lose Billions in Future Economic Returns by Continuing to Underfund CSU and UC.”  Here’s an excerpt:

As we highlighted in a recent analysis, per student spending at the CSU and UC are well below pre-recession levels and are significantly below the funding request from each institution. Governor Brown’s 2018-19 budget proposal continues this trend, allocating a mere 3% General Fund base increase for both institutions. While state leaders deliberate over these marginal increases and whether the universities have been spending wisely the pennies they have been given, the future of California’s students and of our state’s economy hangs in uncertainty.

One of the greatest consequences of underfunding our public institutions of higher education is that thousands of students who are qualified for admittance to the CSU and UC do not attend because of capacity limitations. And while most of these students enroll elsewhere, thousands skip college completely. This state disinvestment in higher education landslides into an underdeveloped workforce that undercuts California’s economic competitiveness, weakens tax revenues, and diminishes the educational, career, and life outcomes for students.

Read the full article on The California Budget & Policy Center’s website.

The University of California Stands Out Among Top Schools When It Comes to Serving Poor Students

On May 1, 2018, The Atlantic published an article, “The University of California Stands Out Among Top Schools When It Comes to Serving Poor Students.”  Here’s an excerpt:

Schools in the University of California system are doing significantly better than other four-year colleges and universities in the country when it comes to enrolling low-income students and seeing them across the finish line. Of the public and private nonprofit schools with a higher-than-average Pell-awardee enrollment rate (the schools this study examined), the UCs occupy five of the top 10 slots in terms of graduating students. Among only public institutions, they are the top seven.

“Every single time we do these outcome measures, the UC system stands out,” Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, who leads the social policy and politics program at Third Way, told me. A 2016 report from Third Way on outcomes for students at public colleges similarly found that colleges in the UC system fared better than their peers.

Why is that? The state money available for higher education makes a big difference—and the UCs have remained among the better-funded colleges in the country, as institutions in other states have seen sharp cuts. They devote a good portion of that funding to getting low-income students onto campus in the first place. In recent years, colleges have placed increased emphasis on outreach to low-income communities to diversify the socioeconomic makeup of their student body, including sending recruiters to schools they haven’t traditionally frequented and helping with college counseling.

Read the full article on The Atlantic’s website.

New Op-Ed from our Co-Chairs: State Needs to Step Up for Higher Education

On March 23, 2018, Fox & Hounds published an op-ed from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education, titled, “State Needs to Step Up for Higher Education.”  Here’s an excerpt:

The polls are in and University of California campuses are slipping.  We are not talking about football or basketball, but about academics.  In the most recent international survey of higher education, UC campuses dropped in 80 categories.  Clearly, the severe fiscal diets imposed on UC and the California State University systems by Sacramento lawmakers have begun to take their toll.

Make no mistake, UC and CSU are still top-flight institutions, but they are not going to maintain their excellence, let alone meet the needs of hundreds of thousands of young Californians whose futures depend on higher education without significantly more State revenue. Even with modest State spending increases over the past few years, per pupil State support for the University of California, which saw a $1 billion drop in State funding during the 2008 recession, has fallen by more than 40% from historic levels.  Allocations for the Cal State system are down by almost 20%.

Both UC and CSU have made significant reductions in their cost structures and improved efficiencies, but the State cutbacks have shifted much of the burden to students and their families through tuition and fee increases.  Now, both systems must consider another round of tuition increases in the face of inadequate State allocations in the 2018-19 Budget proposal from Governor Jerry Brown.

Fortunately.  A bi-partisan group of legislators has stepped up to the plate and proposed “full funding” amounting to an additional $105 million for UC and $171 million for CSU this coming year to avoid another round of tuition hikes and, more importantly, to allow both institutions to support enrollment growth, faculty recruitment and retention, needed facilities and student services. Senator Ben Allen, Chair of the Senate Education Committee, says “investing State resources in preserving college affordability must be a priority.”  Senator Steve Glazer says,“the Legislature must step up.”

The op-ed concludes:

With a healthy State revenue picture, there is no excuse for not passing a 2018-19 State Budget that fully funds our public higher education system and obviates the need for another round of tuition increases this year.  Investment in higher education pays huge dividends for our economy and for the people of California.  A stingy 3% increase for UC and CSU is simply not enough.

Read the complete op-ed on the the Fox & Hounds website.

UC President Janet Napolitano delivers keynote address for Town Hall Los Angeles

On March 19, 2018, University of California President Janet Napolitano delivered a keynote address for Town Hall Los Angeles.  Here’s a transcript:

“150 Years of Opportunity”

Thank you, George, for that introduction. It’s great to be back in LA, and at Town Hall. We’re very fortunate to have George as our Board Chair and to have his excellent leadership. In addition to UC’s Student Regent-Designate Devon Graves, UC Academic Senate Chair Shane White is here.

I’m also honored to welcome two very special students:

  • Skylynn Hayes is a student at West Adams Preparatory High School, an LA Promise Fund partner school that I’ve had the privilege of visiting. Skylynn lost her father when she was young, and was raised by her single mother. She’s excelled academically at West Adams, earning a 3.9 GPA.
  • I’d also like to recognize Adriana Argueta Balan [AH-DREE-ANA AR-GEH-TA BA-LAN] who is also here today. She, too, is a West Adams student, born and raised in Guatemala. When she arrived at West Adams, Adriana did not speak English. But she learned it quickly while holding a part-time job, and now she holds a 3.6 GPA!

Both Skylynn and Adriana have already been accepted to UC Davis and UC Merced, and await responses from some of our other campuses as well.  I hope to see you both at one of UC’s campuses next fall.  Now, let’s give these hard-working students, and all the students in the room, a round of applause!

Students like Skylynn and Adriana embody the spirit behind the University of California. This is a top-notch higher education institution that is accessible to all who work hard and qualify academically, regardless of their income or their background.

And that was the same vision Californians had in mind when they set out to build the University of California 150 years ago. Although they looked to institutions on the East Coast and in Europe for inspiration, they were intent on creating a different kind of university, one more accessible and egalitarian than Oxford or Yale.

The University of California has always been ahead of the curve when it comes to breaking barriers and expanding opportunity.

  • Fifty years before American women secured the right to vote, the University of California was already admitting women. Eight of them attended classes at UC in that first year.
  • And more than two decades before the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriage, the University of California opened its first LGBT resource center – the first of its kind on any California campus.

Perhaps one of the most emblematic stories of UC’s approach to creating opportunity is the one about an African American boy raised in the projects of San Francisco.

Terry Allen was only 13 when he saw his oldest brother killed. And as he became more aware of the steep number of African American men who die young in this country, Terry began to wonder if he was next.

His parents sought to reassure him that education could be his ticket to safety. UC Berkeley was only 15 miles away from where Terry grew up. So, he applied for admission, was accepted, and he went on to graduate from Berkeley in 2013.

His college degree paved the way to a job at the White House as part of the Obama Administration. Terry recently wrote his first book, and launched a non-profit that helps under-developed communities achieve sustainability. Today, Terry is pursuing his Ph.D. and working as a course instructor at the UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.

Stories like Terry’s – of a UC education opening doors to a better future – define the University of California. They have shown us, time and again, that the opportunity to attend UC and earn a college degree can fundamentally change Californians’ lives, and they, in turn, change the lives of others still.

In the 150 years since the University of California was established, we have honored the original vision that makes these life-changing moments possible:

  • Around its 50th year mark, the University expanded its footprint – and its ability to serve Californians of all walks of life – when the “Southern Branch” became an official UC campus. Today, we know that as UCLA. (Go, Bruins!)
  • Near its 100th year mark, UC President Clark Kerr and several other education leaders embarked on an unprecedented effort to define the roles and responsibilities of California’s public higher education institutions. To this day, the Master Plan for Higher Education guides the direction of the University of California, the California State University system, and the California Community Colleges. And each of these three segments plays a critical role in ensuring Californians can access a top-quality, affordable higher education.
  • Today, at its 150th year mark, UC is upholding the original vision of its founders in new and innovative ways: For example, the UC Scout program offers online Advanced Placement and “A-G” courses, enabling students in all corners of California to enroll in the classes they need to qualify for admission to either UC or Cal State. Meanwhile, the University’s partnership with historically black colleges and universities brings African American students to UC for internships during the summer, putting them on a path to pursue graduate education at one of our campuses.

This steadfast commitment to ensuring that every Californian has a shot at a UC education has resulted in remarkable social and economic mobility for the individual: Forty-two percent of UC undergraduates—forty-two percent!—are the first in their family to attend a four-year college or university. Half of them surpass the incomes of their parents by the time they’ve been out of school for five years.

Compared to other four-year colleges in California, UC also enrolls a larger share of students who come from the bottom 20 percent of income earners. For these students, a UC degree can level the playing field for decades to come: they go on to earn as much as students who come from higher income families. In most cases, those earnings double within 10 years of graduation.

This year is the University of California’s 150th anniversary—its sesquicentennial—so it’s natural to reminisce about these past accomplishments. And it’s tempting to look at the University’s stunning story of success and think that we can sit back and simply admire what California has achieved with its public research university system.

But rather than resting on our laurels, these accomplishments should spur us on to further action. Knowing how transformative a UC education can be – for the individual, and for society at large – it’s incumbent upon us to help more Californians become part of the opportunity story at the University of California.

And doing so is not easy. We have no special formula that will conjure up more funding, no silver bullet that can streamline the diversity pipeline, no quick or easy solution to any of the challenges we must overcome. But we do know that a UC education translates into a lifetime of opportunity.

So, this afternoon, I’d like to share with you three specific steps the University of California, in partnership with the State, can take to put a UC degree into the hands of more Californians.

The first step involves community college transfers.

Nearly one-third of UC’s undergraduates begin their higher education path at a community college. These students succeed at the same rate as those who arrive at the University as true freshmen, and they contribute to the diversity of experiences among our student body. Within a decade of completing their UC degrees, over half of those who transferred from a community college, and who work in California, are earning salaries that place them among the top third of income-earners in the state.

And their personal stories are very inspiring. Take Daniela Estrada, for example. Daniela is a UC Irvine political science major who graduated last June with honors, and was named both a Fulbright and a Truman scholar. Daniela was also a first-generation college student whose father was forced to quit school as a young child to pick tobacco in the fields of Mexico.

Early in my presidency, I made a commitment to increase the number of community college transfer students at UC. We have done so by collaborating closely with our counterparts at the California Community Colleges, and by working to simplify the transfer process.

Those efforts have paid off: in the fall of 2017, the University had 6,000 more California Community College transfer students enrolled at our campuses than we did in the fall of 2013, when I first arrived at the University.

But that doesn’t mean our work is done. We need to take it even further. So, earlier this month, I called on UC’s Academic Senate to determine what it will take to extend a guarantee of admission to all qualifying California Community College transfer students.

The guarantee can use the current 21 Transfer Pathways as a key building block. Successful completion of a Pathway, along with obtaining the requisite GPA, should entitle a community college student to a guaranteed place in the UC system. I have asked my colleagues in the Academic Senate to review proposals to facilitate transfer and transfer-preparation so that the guarantees are in place by the fall of 2019, at the outset of the University’s 151st academic year.

This would be a major leap for the University of California – one that must be implemented carefully to achieve its desired effect. I am committed to working closely with the California Community Colleges, and with UC’s own Academic Senate, and with all stakeholders to make sure we get this right.

Of course, many of UC’s undergraduates enroll as freshmen. In keeping with UC’s mission to serve Californians, the University has gone to great lengths to increase enrollment of California students over the past several years – without any new enrollment funding from the state.

Three years ago, we made a commitment to enroll an additional 10,000 California undergraduates by the 2018-19 academic year. I’m proud to report that we have already met that goal, and that today, more Californians study at the University of California than at any time in our history. Importantly, our undergraduate student body is ever more diverse: nearly one-third of the students who enrolled last fall come from historically under-represented minority groups, and they do extraordinarily well at UC.

Now, the push to increase enrollment of Californians comes, in part, because of the great demand for a UC education. Last year, the number of UC admission applications broke the record for the 13th straight year. That same demand also dictates that we do everything we can to help our current UC students graduate on time, and make room for the next cohort of undergraduates. And that’s where step two comes in.

This month, I called on UC’s Chancellors to explore how we can further streamline the degree pipeline, and ensure that at least 70 percent of our undergraduates graduate within four years.

Raising UC’s four-year graduation rate from its current 64 percent level would make room for more undergraduates, and generate an additional 32,000 undergraduate degrees between now and 2030—almost like adding an entirely new UC campus. Students will be able to reduce their college costs by moving more quickly into the workforce, or to graduate or professional school.

I believe we can meet this challenge by expanding access to online education courses, increasing UC’s summer session enrollment, encouraging more students to study abroad, and doubling-down on our student support services.

Once more, we will be conscientious in our approach. We will not diminish UC’s academic quality or our students’ ability to succeed by forcing a one-size-fits-all educational model. But we will push our University community to widen the definition of what a UC education can look like, and provide new ways for California students to earn their degrees in a timely manner.

This brings me to the third step UC and California must take together.

We’ve been told for some time that our state will soon face a significant shortage in college-educated residents. That’s a prospect that should concern every single Californian who cares about the state’s future. It demands that we grapple with a complex question: how do we help more Californians achieve the college education we know they need and want?

I have asked the State Legislature, and I will ask the next Governor of California, to work with UC and CSU to help answer that question. Together, we can tackle the college graduate gap, and make sure that our state is producing the educated workforce it needs for the decades ahead.

Our partners at the LA Promise Fund are also targeting the problem, and I applaud their efforts. Over the next several months, they will begin implementing a plan to help more students in the Los Angeles area earn college degrees. They will focus on expanding college access and persistence services, public communication efforts, and regional partnerships.

Now, the effort to address the degree gap will require close collaboration and careful planning on the part of the state’s public higher education segments. But it will also require a significant investment by the state to fund critical educational needs. UC is grateful for the state support we’ve received in recent years, following devastating budget cuts that occurred during the Great Recession. But we still do not have sufficient state support to pay for increases in enrollment, the necessary expansion of our campuses, or the growing needs of our students.

In fact, the University of California educates 90,000 more students today than we did in the year 2000, yet our state appropriation has remained basically the same. Put another way, if UC received the same per-student funding today as we did in 2000, our state appropriation would amount to more than $7 billion, instead of the $3.4 billion we currently receive. It’s a big gap.

This, too, should concern every single Californian. A vibrant University of California is essential to the upward trajectory of our state and its people. You’ve heard snippets today about graduates whose UC experience made it possible for them to accomplish incredible things. I’d like to close my remarks today with one last story. This one is about a Californian who credits his UC education not only with creating opportunities that changed his life, but with saving his life.

Frankie Guzman seemed to be headed for a life behind bars. He was raised in the poor, mostly immigrant community of East Oxnard, about 60 miles away from here. He endured his parents’ divorce and his family’s subsequent homelessness at the age of 3. By the time Frankie was 15, he was arrested for armed robbery, and, on his first offense, was sentenced to serve 15 years in the California Youth Authority.

Frankie was released on parole after six years served, and went on to attend Oxnard Community College. His education was interrupted when he was re-incarcerated twice, but he persisted with his studies, and he eventually gained admission to UC Berkeley. After graduating, he was accepted to the UCLA School of Law, and earned his law degree in 2012.

Today, Frankie Guzman works as an attorney for the National Center for Youth Law in Oakland, serving as Director of the California Juvenile Justice Initiative. He’s putting his personal experiences and his UC education to good use by working with state leaders to pass legislation to reform incarceration practices for juveniles. Earlier this year, he won the prestigious Juvenile Law Center’s Leadership Prize for his efforts.

When asked to reflect on his college education, Frankie summed it up simply: “I’d be in a dark place without it.”

Frankie’s journey illustrates what many of us already know well: that education is the great equalizer, and that the University of California is the ultimate opportunity-creator. And so, as our state grows more diverse, and as UC’s enrollment continues to increase, now is not the time to pull back on our investment in public higher education. Now is the time for Californians to double-down on their investment—to expand access to the University of California, and to sustain its academic quality.

When I last addressed a Town Hall Los Angeles audience almost three years ago, I said that all Californians have a voice—and a stake—in the public dialogue about the University of California. I argued that the focus of that dialogue ought to be on what we can do, together, to ensure that the University of California is an even greater public research university in the future than it has been in the past. Those words still hold true now—maybe more so today as we celebrate UC’s sesquicentennial, and consider what kind of public research university we want for California in the next century and a half.

Many of you have been champions for education and outspoken supporters of this university—including Antonia Hernandez of the California Community Foundation; Veronica Melvin of the LA Promise Fund; Michele Siqueiros of the Campaign for College Opportunity; Oscar Cruz of Families in Schools; and members of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education. I hope that when you leave here today, it will be with a renewed energy for this important advocacy work, a personal stake in the dialogue about UC’s future, and a lucid vision for how a UC education can open the doors of opportunity wide open for the next generation of Californians.

I believe the University of California is an institution worth investing in – and worth fighting for. UC is special—a daring public experiment that’s become a priceless public good. It belongs to all of us, and today, I ask that you join me in working to ensure that every Californian gets the opportunity to reap its extraordinary rewards.

Thank you! This is a great university, and the fight is on. So, let me close with the motto of the University of California, “Fiat Lux!” Or, “Let There Be Light!”

New op-ed: How much does Gov. Brown value higher education?

On Feb. 14, 2018, The Sacramento Bee published an op-ed from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education, titled, “How much does Gov. Brown value higher education?”  Here’s an excerpt:

When it comes to higher education, Gov. Jerry Brown is an enigma. He highlights its importance, but his budget priorities short change the University of California and the California State University. …

Both UC and CSU have had no choice but to increase tuition and fees, shifting much of the cost to students and their families. Both systems have also implemented reforms and innovations that have saved many millions of dollars. It is exasperating to hear public officials condemn further tuition hikes, while they withhold the state dollars, making those increases necessary. Even with tuition and fee increases, more than half of students pay nothing thanks to generous financial aid programs.

The state’s investment in higher education should be a no brainer.

The op-ed concludes:

The Public Policy Institute of California has projected the state will need more than one million additional college graduates in our workforce by 2030. Our economic health depends in no small measure on the vitality and productivity of public higher education. Even as the number of qualified applicants grows, it is tragic that UC and CSU campuses are forced to turn away thousands of Californians.

Obviously, the state has many priorities, but that should not be a rationale for short-changing our higher education system and the tens of thousands of young men and women whose future is riding on a first-rate college education. Because those with a college degree earn substantially more over their careers, our investment in higher education more than pays for itself in economic growth and state and local tax revenue.

State revenues are running ahead of projections. Wouldn’t it make sense to devote a good portion of that money to public higher education?

Read the complete op-ed on the The Sacramento Bee website.

Orange County Register Editorial Board: “Invest in UC system or lose a key California asset”

On March 14, 2018, The Orange County Register Editorial Board published, “Invest in UC system or lose a key California asset.”  Here’s an excerpt:

As the Los Angeles Times reported, UC Berkeley and UCLA still were ranked in the top 10 universities in the world, which in this survey, by QS Quacquarelli Symonds, included both public and private schools.

The good news is that UC Berkeley is still tied with Harvard for third and that UCLA, the most-applied-to university anywhere, is still in seventh place.

But the alarming news is that the biggest declines in department rankings also came at those two campuses, which have long been at the top of the University of California heap. UCLA saw its rankings go down in 22 subjects and improve in four while Berkeley went down in 15 areas and up in just two. In the economically crucial fields of civil and structural engineering, UCLA’s ranking went down from 40th to 51st and Berkeley’s from second to fifth.

“There has been a steady, sustained disinvestment in the UC and this is the inevitable result,” Shane White, chairman of the UC Academic Senate, told the Times. “This is probably the tip of the iceberg.”

It is impossible to overstate the economic and cultural impact the University of California has had on our state. If we don’t continue to invest both public monies and crank up the private fundraising each campus must now do on its own, we risk losing a very important Golden State asset for us all.

Read the full editorial on The Orange County Register’s website.

Senators, Students, Faculty Call for Full Funding, Tuition Freeze

On March 12, 2018, California State Sen. Steve Glazer, chair of the Senate Select Committee on Student Success, issued this release, “Senators, Students, Faculty Call for Full Funding, Tuition Freeze”:

A broad, bipartisan coalition of legislators, students and faculty called for full funding and a tuition freeze for students at the California State University and the University of California at a Capitol news conference Monday.

Both CSU and UC are considering tuition increases to compensate for a shortfall in the Governor’s budget. CSU is seeking $171 million more in state funding to avoid tuition hikes and to provide greater access to more qualified California students; UC is seeking $105 million more.

“The UC Regents and the CSU Trustees are now on the verge of passing yet another tuition hike,” said Sen. Steve Glazer, D-Orinda, the chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Student Success. “We cannot let this happen. The Legislature needs to step up. We must make this investment – not just in our children but in the future of our great state.”

“In a year when state budget revenues are expected to be robust, and when we’ve already raised tuition so much, we shouldn’t be imposing more tuition increases on the families of students at our public universities,” said Ben Allen, D-Santa Monica, chairman of the Senate Education Committee. “Investing state resources in preserving college affordability must be a priority, for the sake of today’s young people and for the future of our state.

The Governor’s budget proposed a 3 percent increase for both CSU and UC, or a $92 million boost from last year. But, both institutions say that leaves them in a position of having to make up for shortfalls. To ensure tuitions remain flat, CSU is seeking $263 million more than last year; UC says it needs $197 million more than last year

Full funding would allow CSU to cover expanding access to qualified California students (3,641 additional FTE students); its Graduation Initiative 2025; agreed-upon compensation increases for faculty and other employees; and some infrastructure needs, including critical deferred maintenance.

For the UC, full funding would cover the expansion of access (500 California undergraduates, 500 graduate students); catch-up funding for recent enrollment growth (1,500 students); and faculty hiring, academic counseling, student mental health services, graduate students support and classroom facilities.

Joining Sens. Glazer and Allen were Democratic and Republican members of the Assembly and Senate, CSU and UC students and faculty.

How and why Cal State Fullerton students launch companies before they graduate

On January 30, 2018, The Orange County Register reported on, “How and why Cal State Fullerton students launch companies before they graduate.”  Here’s an excerpt:

When the students in Cal State Fullerton’s New Venture Creation and Funding class created startups during fall semester, they had mentors and a professor to give them advice, templates to create their business plans, a panel of investors to hear their pitches and the resources of Mihaylo College of Business and Economics behind them.

They hadn’t yet had to max out their credit cards or ask parents and friends for money to realize their dreams. In fact, they hadn’t even graduated yet.

The class, part of Mihaylo’s Entrepreneurship program, attracts students who don’t aspire to work for Amazon or Bank of America, said John Bradley Jackson, director of the Center for Entrepreneurship, but who want to do their own thing. …

The student teams in Jackson’s class each came up with a “business model canvas,” which lays out infrastructure, offerings, customers and financing. They incorporated surveys and interviews with prospective customers into their research, constantly tweaking their ideas before presenting them to a panel of investors, who pointed out problems no one saw and suggestions to make the idea better. …

Many ideas die as soon as the presentation is over. But some grow into real revenue-producing concerns. In the process, concepts shift, company names change and business models get tweaked.

Successful business launches from previous entrepreneurship students include Bootlegger’s Brewery, a craft beer maker in Fullerton; Wecademi, which connects struggling students with tutors who have taken the same class; and Piano with Jonny, which offers online piano lessons.

Read the complete article on The Orange County Register website.

California State University Chancellor delivers State of the CSU address

On January 30, 2018, Timothy P. White, Chancellor of California State University, delivered “Legacy and Vision: 2018 State of the CSU” in Long Beach, California.  Here’s an excerpt:

That’s why it’s important… in line with our legacy… to keep costs as low as possible for our students… while also understanding the reality that a quality education does take resources. And that in today’s new normal here in California… the days of fully-subsidized tuition are in the past. The simple truth is that someone always pays… it’s who pays that has changed over time.

Make no mistake… we are thankful for incremental increases in our state appropriation in recent years. Yet, these increases in support from the state are going in large part to the rising costs of healthcare… or other mandated and inflationary costs that eat away at progress that we’ve made. We are, essentially, trying to walk up a down escalator.

Even with the remarkable improvements in efficiency and cost-reduction we have done and will continue to do – as described later in this meeting in the budget and finance report by Steve Relyea – we can’t progress to meet California’s needs and our students’ expectations of us. Indeed, we’re on an unsustainable pathway. This concerns and saddens me… as a Californian, as an educator, and as your Chancellor.

And while the idealist in me says that someday the state will take us back to the days of free education as a public investment, the realist in me says that’s not going to happen in our lifetime. Still… with all due respect, I will continue to say to our elected leaders… the moment to properly invest in the CSU is overdue… and as our trustees have requested year in and year out.

We are, after all, all Californians.

It shouldn’t be the CSU versus the State of California when it comes to resources… it should be us working together to serve Californians. With a strong economy, robust state coffers and new industries generating millions – if not billions – in additional taxes and fees… all developments resulting in the growing need for a university-educated populace… it is imperative to invest adequately in the today that fuels the tomorrow.

Read the full transcript on the CSU website.

The Need for College Graduates in California’s Future Economy

On November 1, 2017, Hans Johnson, director and senior fellow at the PPIC Higher Education Center, testified before the Assembly Select Committee on the Master Plan for Higher Education in California. The master plan defined a strategy to meet the state’s education needs in 1960—but today, California faces new challenges. The topic of the hearing: ensuring that the master plan meets workforce needs.

Here’s an excerpt:

Our primary finding is that California faces a shortage of highly educated workers. Specifically, economic projections to 2030 show that about two in five jobs will require at least a bachelor’s degree, while demographic projections suggest only about one in three Californians will have at least a bachelor’s degree. This shortfall equates to 1.1 million workers. …

To close the gap, California and its higher education institutions will need to establish new policies and practices to enroll more students, especially in our four-year colleges and universities, and ensure greater success of students already in college. In previous testimony, PPIC has identified targets for each of the state’s public systems with respect to admission, transfer (from community colleges to four-year colleges), and improved graduation rates. Improving access and success among groups historically underrepresented in higher education, including low-income students, first-generation college students, Latinos, and African Americans is essential if we are to close the degree gap.

The good news is that new goals adopted by the California State University (CSU) system and the California Community College system are entirely consistent with PPIC’s identified targets. New initiatives, including remediation reform at the community colleges and at CSU, have the potential to substantially increase student success. CSU’s new graduation initiative aims to substantially increase graduation rates and eliminate gaps between groups of students. Strong increases in college preparation among the state’s high school graduates are also a positive sign, with the share of students completing the college preparatory requirements of UC and CSU reaching an all-time high.

Finding ways to accommodate all these students remains a central challenge, but one we must meet in order to ensure a better future for all Californians.

Read his prepared remarks on the PPIC website.

New Op-ed: Big Picture Focus Needed for Higher Ed

On Sept. 28, 2017, Fox & Hounds published an op-ed from Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education, titled, “Big Picture Focus Needed for Higher Education.”  Here’s an excerpt:

In recent years, there has been some progress in restoring a portion of the funding lost by higher education in State Budgets as the Legislature and the Governor’s office have sought to cope with a volatile economy and competing demands on the State’s resources.  Yet per student State funding for UC and CSU remains only a fraction of what it was two decades ago.

Too often, lately, legislators have focused on proposals to micro-manage the three systems, rather than addressing the imperative of bringing State support back to a level where our campuses can accommodate all qualified applicants seeking a first-rate education. Today, our high schools are producing more college ready graduates than was envisioned in the Master Plan in 1960—almost a third more for CSU and at least 10% more for UC.  It makes no sense for UC and CSU to have to shut the door on qualified California students.

Obviously, much has changed in the past 60 years.  California has experienced massive growth.  Technological change has remade our society and our economy.  Our population is highly diverse and filled with young people seeking opportunity.  California’s workforce needs have tilted decisively toward college graduates.

The Assembly Select Committee on the Master Plan should look at the big picture—how our higher education system can maintain excellence, sustain affordability for students and their families and improve access for those Californians ready and able.  California’s Master Plan continues to serve us well.  Our friends in the Capitol just need to find the dollars to keep its commitment of a quality education for each new generation.

Read the complete op-ed on the Fox & Hounds website.

California’s public universities struggle with rising college eligibility

On August 17, 2017, EdSource reported, “California’s public universities struggle with rising college eligibility.” Here’s an excerpt:

California in many ways is a victim of its own success in preparing ever larger numbers of students for college.

That is one way to look at the recent flap over the revocation of admission offers to about 500 students at UC Irvine who had either not sustained their academic performance during their last semester in high school or had not submitted their final high school transcripts as required by university rules. …

What is clear is that there are no easy or quick fixes to meeting the need to educate California’s growing youthful population — and the rising percentage of students who are leaving high school eligible to attend UC or CSU.

In the future, administrators at individual UC and CSU campuses may be more successful in accurately anticipating what percentage of incoming freshman they should offer admission to avoid the debacles experienced at UC Irvine and Cal Poly.

But doing so shouldn’t obscure the welcome reality that efforts to better prepare students to attend college are paying off. Instead of backing off those efforts, it would be far more desirable to admit more California students, and for the state to underwrite the additional costs to allow its famed public universities to do so.

Read the complete article on the EdSource website.

Community college transfer degrees speed graduation at CSU

On August 10, 2017, The Sacramento Bee reported, “Community college transfer degrees speed graduation at CSU.” Here’s an excerpt:

Early alumni of California’s community college transfer program are showing promising results for the 7-year-old law’s efforts to ease the path to a bachelor’s degree.

Of a group of nearly 1,100 students who transferred to California State University in fall 2013 with the Associate Degree for Transfer, 48 percent graduated within two years, data provided by CSU shows, compared to 31 percent of all undergraduate transfers. Within three years, 80 percent had completed their studies, 16 percentage points higher than transfer students overall.

Read the complete article on The Sacramento Bee website.

Now for the hard part: translating vision for community colleges into student success

On July 18, 2017, EdSource reported, “Now for the hard part: translating vision for community colleges into student success.” The article reports on a new document titled “Vision for Success,” adopted by California’s Community College system.

Here’s an excerpt from the report:

“Despite some modest gains in student outcomes, the community college system is not performing at the level needed to reliably provide students with opportunities for mobility and to meet California’s future workforce needs.”

The article continues:

The report sets a number of goals for the system, such as increasing by 20 percent the number of community college students who end up with associate degrees, or obtain certification for “specific skill sets that prepare them for an in-demand job.”

It sets a target of increasing by 35 percent the number of community colleges who transfer each year to UC and CSU. It calls for reducing the average number of units a community college student accumulates from 87 units to 79 units.

Individual colleges are urged to do more to encourage students to attend full time, especially younger students who are not responsible for supporting family members. Students should be encouraged to complete 30 units per year.

However, the community colleges face substantial challenges in realizing the ambitious and worthy goals outlined in the report. The community colleges comprise a decentralized system in which campuses are organized into 72 districts overseen by locally elected boards of trustees. As a result, edicts from Sacramento will not have their desired outcomes unless there is buy-in at a local level.

Read the complete article on the EdSource website.

Cal State trustees grapple with boosting graduation rates and enrollment

On July 18, 2017, the Los Angeles Times reported, “Cal State trustees grapple with boosting graduation rates and enrollment.” Here’s an excerpt:

About 31,000 fully qualified students were turned away from California State University for the fall term because their desired school was at capacity, administrators told trustees during a meeting Tuesday as they discussed budget challenges and new directives to increase enrollment at the largest public university system in the nation.

In regards to additional state funding, the Times reported:

The funding boost for this fiscal year, which began July 1, amounted to about half of the additional money trustees had estimated was necessary to meet their budget needs. Revenue from the tuition increase will help cover some of the remaining budget gap.

Read the complete article on the Los Angeles Times website.

Meeting California’s Need for College Graduates: A Regional Perspective

A new report from the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC)  addresses “Meeting California’s Need for College Graduates: A Regional Perspective.” Here’s an excerpt from the June 2017 report:

California needs 1.1 million more workers with bachelor’s degrees by 2030 to keep up with economic demand. More college graduates would mean higher incomes, greater economic mobility, more tax revenue, and less demand for social services. In addressing this projected shortfall, three regions will play an especially critical role: Los Angeles County, the Inland Empire, and the San Joaquin Valley. Indeed, improving college outcomes in these regions could help close more than half of the statewide skills gap.

The report offers recommendations:

Despite the challenges ahead, considerable progress has already occurred. Student preparation for college is up in all three regions, as are college enrollment and graduation rates. Our research highlights several opportunities to build on this progress:

  • Increase capacity at four-year universities by continuing to focus on four-year graduation rates and encouraging satellite campuses.
  • Streamline the transfer pathway by aligning student success initiatives among community colleges, public universities, and private nonprofit colleges in the same region.
  • Develop regional promise programs with common standards to reduce inequities and expand reach beyond what local programs can offer.
  • Support regional data-sharing partnerships, such as the Central Valley Higher Education Consortium and Growing Inland Achievement, to promote the coordination and evaluation of regional efforts.

Read the report and summary on the PPIC website.

California lawmakers chip away at state’s college affordability crisis

On July 6, 2017, CALmatters reported, “California lawmakers chip away at state’s college affordability crisis.” CALmatters is a nonpartisan, nonprofit journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters.  Here’s an excerpt of the article:

SO, DID CALIFORNIA DO ANYTHING THIS YEAR TO MAKE COLLEGE MORE AFFORDABLE?

Yes. The state budget Brown signed last week includes about $50 million in new funding for community college students—money targeted for living expenses. Recipients of Cal Grants, which help pay for tuition and fees, will now qualify for nearly $2,500 in new state grants for living expenses, depending on how many credits they take per year.

The budget also protects the Middle Class Scholarship program, even though critics have raised questions about whether the grants are serving the families it was designed to target.

Cochrane said she’s pleased that Sacramento is finally paying attention to college affordability. Her organization is part of a coalition that proposed several alternatives for the Legislature to consider next year when it revives talks on the Assembly’s “degrees not debt” plan.

“The focus on big proposals is exciting,” Cochrane said. “It signals a willingness and interest in dedicating new resources to higher education affordability. The next question to discuss is how to spend that money.”

Read the complete article on the CALmatters website.

California State University will soon offer admission to all qualified applicants

On June 19, 2017, the Mercury News reported, “California State University will soon offer admission to all qualified applicants.” Here’s an excerpt:

Students who qualify for admission to California State University will soon get an acceptance letter from at least one of the system’s 23 campuses. …

Under the state’s new budget deal, qualified California students who don’t get into their campus of choice will be admitted to another campus with space. The change is modeled after the University of California’s policy. UC promises admission to students who rank in the top 9 percent of graduates in the state. …

The assemblyman acknowledged funding constraints present a challenge, but said the newest budget includes more money for CSU to enroll more students. CSU has until next May to come up with a policy.

“We will engage faculty and administrative leadership to determine how we can best move forward to implement these directives that are intended to better serve Californians,” CSU Chancellor Timothy White said in a statement Monday morning.

Read the complete article on the Mercury News website.

LA Times Op-Ed: When California and the UC system fight, the state’s kids and its economy lose

On June 5, 2017, published an op-ed “When California and the UC system fight, the state’s kids and its economy lose.”  Here’s an excerpt:

Brown and our representatives are grandstanding, talking about punishing UC by withholding funds that might be needed for actual education and exerting more control over UC through the president’s office. …

If there’s a big problem at UC, both sides should agree on an independent, outside organization — not an auditing agency that works for the governor — to examine the situation, and where California’s great research university system should go from here. The rancor between UC and state leaders over the past few years isn’t good for the university, California or the state’s high-achieving students who rely on it for an affordable, first-rate higher education.

Read the complete op-ed on the LA Times website.

California public higher ed tops New York Times’ rankings of “Colleges Doing the Most for the American Dream”

California public higher ed tops The New York Times’ rankings of “Colleges Doing the Most for the American Dream,” with UCs taking 6 of the top 10 spots.  Learn more on the The New York Times website.

LA Times Editorial: UC’s $175 million in hidden funds might not be $175 million — and they might not be hidden

On April 28, 2017, the Los Angeles Times Editorial Board published an editorial, “UC’s $175 million in hidden funds might not be $175 million — and they might not be hidden.” Here’s an excerpt:

Still, it’s naïve to read the audit without also considering the troubling political backdrop. This is the eighth audit of UC in just a few years, urged on by legislators who have their own vision of UC’s mission and their own political agendas. They have long hinted at — or openly advocated — giving the Legislature and governor more control over the university and its educational priorities. What’s stopping them? The California Constitution, which grants the regents that authority.

It was smart to give UC that autonomy. Politicians make notoriously lousy educators, and their handling of the state’s public schools should give no one any confidence in their ability to run one of the world’s great universities. The audit’s call for a tighter leash on UC’s operations seems unfounded at this point.

The joint committee meeting this week needs to be a genuine search for truth, not a stage for political rhetoric or unfounded attack.

Read the complete article on the LA Times website.

New Higher Ed Fact Sheet from Public Policy Institute of California

This fact sheet from the Public Policy Institute of California offers a snapshot of funding for higher education—the third-largest state budget area. After declining for several decades, state higher education funding has increased since 2010. Community college funding is at an all-time high—but UC and CSU still get more per student.

See the fact sheet on the PPIC website.

Education is a universal right that extends to immigrants, Cal State chancellor declares

On Feb. 1, 2017, the Los Angeles Times published an article, “Education is a universal right that extends to immigrants, Cal State chancellor declares”. Here’s an excerpt:

California State University Chancellor Timothy P. White, in the annual state of the CSU address Wednesday, spoke of his ongoing commitment to protect vulnerable immigrant students and said access to education is a universal right.

“We will go as far as state and federal laws allow to ensure all students have that opportunity,” White said. “Why? Because, we know that a person’s intelligence — their capacity for learning and advancing human progress — in no way depends on what side of a border they were born on. We know that an empowered person does not take opportunity from others. Rather, they create opportunity for those who surround them.”

White’s remarks came at the close of a two-day board of trustees meeting in Long Beach, where university leaders debated whether to increase tuition as a way to fill a looming gap in state funding.

Read the complete article on the LA Times website.

If the question is upward mobility the answer is California colleges

On Feb. 1, 2017, Fox & Hounds published commentary from resident of the California Foundation for Commerce and Education, titled, “If the question is upward mobility the answer is California colleges.”  Here’s an excerpt:

What’s the most effective tool to improve economic mobility in California?

Higher minimum wage? No.
Mandatory employment benefits? Nope.
Higher redistributive taxes? Nada.

It’s the California State University and community colleges.

According to a landmark study for the Equality Opportunity Project, Stanford’s Raj Chetty and coauthors found that certain state and community colleges offer effective pathways to higher incomes for younger generations.

By looking at the mobility rate of every college in America, the authors found that highly selective colleges do well in channeling children from low- or middle-income families to the top 1 percent of the income distribution, but in one of the study’s most compelling findings — the colleges with the highest upward mobility rates are typically mid-tier public schools that have both large numbers of low-income students and very good earnings outcomes.

Of the top ten colleges in the country with the best mobility rates, three are in California: top-ranked Cal State Los Angeles, Glendale Community College and Cal Poly Pomona.

Read the complete article on the Fox & Hounds website.

Tuition hike, budget gaps top agenda as Cal State trustees discuss priorities for 2017

On January 30, 2017, the Los Angeles Times published an article, “Tuition hike, budget gaps top agenda as Cal State trustees discuss priorities for 2017”. Here’s an excerpt:

California State University’s trustees on Tuesday will debate raising tuition after a six-year freeze — a controversial idea that has grown more inevitable after the governor’s recent budget proposal.

Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget allocated less than half the additional state funding university officials said was necessary to preserve the quality of the nation’s largest public university system. …

State funding covers about half of Cal State’s operating costs, compared with 80% in the 1990s, administrators said. The system relies on its 470,000 students’ tuition and fees to cover the rest.

The state slashed nearly one-third of its support to Cal State during the recession but has steadily restored funding in the last six years. Over that time, Brown pledged annual increases in exchange for a tuition freeze.

At the November trustees meeting, White said that raising tuition was something “none of us want to do,” and that the top priority is to lobby state lawmakers to make it unnecessary by fully funding Cal State’s budget request.

Read the complete article on the LA Times website.

LA Times tuition article tells the story of state underfunding of the UC system

On January 26, 2017, the Los Angeles Times published an article, “UC regents approve first tuition increase after six-year freeze; some students ‘infuriated'”  Here’s an excerpt:

UC President Janet Napolitano had told regents a day earlier that an increase was needed to ensure that the renowned public research university system could continue to deliver the same top-notch education today as in the past, even as it grapples with escalating enrollment demands and reduced state support.

The 10-campus system, she said, had responded to deep state funding cuts during the Great Recession by saving more than $320 million through reforms. Despite such efforts, campuses are struggling with higher student-faculty ratios, fewer courses, fewer teaching assistants and overtaxed student services.

“We have done more with less, but at a cost,” she said. …

Napolitano’s office, in a memo to regents, presented data showing that state support for instructional costs per student has dropped by more than half, from $16,980 in 2000-01 to an estimated $7,160 this year. Over the same time, the share UC has to cover — from tuition and fees and general funds — rose from $5,860 to $9,450.

Read the complete article on the LA Times website.

CSU faculty say in new report that funding losses have hurt students of color

On January 12, 2017, the Los Angeles Daily News published an article, “CSU faculty say in new report that funding losses have hurt students of color.”  Here’s an excerpt:

The decline in per-student funding within the Cal State University system has coincided with campus student bodies becoming more diverse, thus making it more difficult for young people of color to obtain a degree, faculty members said in a new report.

The California Faculty Association report, released Thursday, does not accuse policymakers of racism in their funding decisions. Instead, the report argues that the years of increased diversity within the Long Beach-based CSU coincided with a time of growing skepticism over the value of government services.

All the same, faculty contended nonwhite students have been dealt a poor hand.

“Today’s students, the majority being students of color, are paying more for their education than their counterparts, the majority who were white, did so just a few decades ago,” said Cecil Canton, associate vice president of affirmative action for the California Faculty Association.

Read the complete article on the Los Angeles Daily News website.

UC needs a tuition hike, but also a clearer vision of its identity – LA Times Editorial

On January 16, 2017, the Los Angeles Times published an editorial, “UC needs a tuition hike, but also a clearer vision of its identity.”  Here’s an excerpt:

No one likes to see the price of higher education rise, but if Napolitano is true to her word and this money is used solely to improve the education of those who pay it, the price hike is justified. There are valid concerns about the long-term funding of the university, but for the short-term, preserving UC’s quality in exchange for a small increase in tuition and fees is the right move. The Board of Regents should approve the price hike when it meets next week. …

The governor, who has never been a major supporter of UC, basically resisted anything that would help the university bring in more money — higher tuition, better funding from the state or admitting more out-of-state students, who bring geographic diversity to campus in addition to paying a higher tuition that helps fund financial aid for low-income Californians. Instead, Brown expressed his preference for a more austere UC, one that saves money by pushing more online courses and prodding professors into teaching more classes while engaging less in research and other academic pursuits.

That’s not a vision, though. It’s short-sighted frugality that would strip down one of the state’s best-run and most admired institutions. …

California can do better than make a public university education a strain on its own middle class, and it cannot afford to let mediocrity overtake an institution that draws great minds and tremendous investment to the state. The state needs a true vision, one that is realistic yet as bold as that outlined in the Master Plan for Higher Education, and which includes major reinvestment in California’s jewel of higher education.

Read the complete editorial on the LA Times website.

UC freshman applications shatter records, with gains among all racial groups

On December 19, 2016, the Los Angeles Times reported that “UC freshman applications shatter records, with gains among all racial groups.”  Here’s an excerpt:

The University of California received more than 171,000 freshman applications for fall 2017, marking a new record with gains across all racial and ethnic groups.

The applicants included more than 111,600 California high school seniors, a 6% rise over last year, according to prelimary UC data released Monday. Overall, the top campus choice was UCLA, followed by UC San Diego, UC Irvine, UC Berkeley and UC Santa Barbara.

The record number of in-state applicants will help UC meet its pledge to enroll an additional 2,500 Californians next fall, said UC President Janet Napolitano. In response to public criticism over UC’s rising out-of-state enrollment, Napolitano in 2015 forged a three-year deal with Gov. Jerry Brown and the Legislature to add a total of 10,000 more Californians to the system by 2018.

“This year’s applications affirm, once again, that Californians’ demand for a UC education keeps getting stronger,” Napolitano said in a statement. “This is a testament to the excellence of California’s public research university, and reinforces the imperative to continue working with our state government to preserve UC’s quality and affordability, and to ensure there is a place at the university for every deserving California student.”

Read the complete article on the LA Times website.

Californians rate public colleges highly and back giving them more state dollars, survey shows

On December 8, 2016, the Los Angeles Times reported on a new statewide survey by the Public Policy Institute of California.  Here’s an excerpt:

Most Californians give high marks to their public universities and colleges but worry they are too expensive, according to a statewide survey released Thursday.

The majority of Californians surveyed by the Public Policy Institute of California support more money for public higher education, but they disagree over how to raise it. Three-fourths reject tuition increases — which are being considered for next year by the University of California and Cal State University — but a majority said they would back a statewide bond for construction projects. …

“How are we going to make sure Californians are going to afford the cost of higher education is first and foremost on people’s minds,” [Mark Baldassare, president of the San Francisco-based nonpartisan institute,] said. “There’s a strong belief that the state needs to invest more.”

Nearly three-quarters of those surveyed — spanning all political parties, race, ethnicities, incomes and education levels — said they believed that college costs prevent qualified and motivated young people from pursuing higher education and backed making community colleges tuition-free. An even greater share — 82% — supported more scholarships and grants for students. ….

Nearly all respondents to the survey agreed that higher education was important to California’s quality of life and economic vitality over the next two decades — though Democrats, African Americans, Latinos and Asians held those views more strongly than Republicans and whites.

Two-thirds of Californians said all three systems of public higher education were doing good or excellent jobs. They gave the UC and Cal State systems higher approval ratings than they got in a 2011 survey.

Read the complete article, “Californians rate public colleges highly and back giving them more state dollars, survey shows,” on the LA Times website.

Report: CSU, UC offer students good economic returns for a reasonable price

On November 23, 2016, the Public Policy Institute of California reported that “The US government’s yearly scorecard shows CSU, UC offer students good economic returns for a reasonable price.”  Here’s an excerpt:

The [US Department of Education’s yearly] scorecard also highlights 26 affordable universities with good outcomes in the form of relatively high earnings. California’s public universities do quite well: eight California State University (CSU) and University of California (UC) campuses make the list. This list uses a school’s average net price (its tuition, fees, room, board, and other expenses minus the average amount of grants and scholarships) and the typical student’s earnings 10 years after enrolling to estimate how much “bang for their buck” students get in terms of future income.

In fact, almost all CSU and UC campuses provide higher-than-average incomes given their net price when compared to four-year colleges nationwide. … California also likely benefits from high-quality institutions. Most UCs are highly ranked nationally, and as PPIC has shown in other research, CSUs have relatively good six-year graduation rates when compared to similar institutions. This is important, as the scorecard reports the incomes of students who attended a university, regardless of whether they graduated. College graduates tend to make more than non-graduates, so institutions with better graduation rates are more likely to produce workers with higher incomes.

Read the blog post, “CSU and UC Are a Better Value Than Universities Nationwide,” on the PPIC website.

A Social-Justice Agenda for Community College

Incoming chancellor for California’s community college system Eloy Oakley discusses expanding access to traditionally underserved communities as an economic imperative for the state and nation in a September 30, 2016, article in The Atlantic.  Here’s an excerpt:

Oakley, who is himself a product of the system and a first-generation college student who grew up in a family where higher education was not the expectation, is under no illusion that California’s community colleges alone can close the racial and socioeconomic educational attainment gaps that plague the state. But Oakley, who will be the first Latino to hold the position, wants California’s 113 community colleges to see eliminating the inequity and opportunity disparities that create those divides as part of their shared responsibility.

“I don’t think there is a greater equalizer than California community colleges in terms of the ability to take someone from a community where college hasn’t even been thought of and transform that individual and give them the opportunity to create a family that now thinks about college as an expectation,” he said.

Read the complete article, “A Social-Justice Agenda for Community College,” on The Atlantic’s website.

State funding cuts during the recession still shortchanging Cal State students

The Los Angeles Times reported on July 19, 2016, about “State funding cuts during the recession still shortchanging Cal State students, officials say.”  Here are excerpts:

State budget cuts have left California State University with about 19% less in funding to spend per student compared with pre-recession years — compromising efforts to fully address student needs, university officials said…..

This issue will continue to be a sticking point. Although enrollment has increased by about 20,000 since 2008, officials have not been able to make room for everyone who wants to attend one of Cal State’s 23 campuses.

Cal State Chancellor Timothy P. White spoke to the issues:

“That is the nexus of our dilemma,” White told the trustees. “In the absence of resources, and you look at the difficult decisions we had to make to live within our means again this year, you see that we end up disinvesting in those support services that enable the very students that we ourselves are under the gun to get their degrees sooner rather than later.”

Read the full article on the Los Angeles Times website.

 

Public Colleges Chase Out-of-State Students, and Tuition

The New York Times reported on July 7, 2016, on how “Public Colleges Chase Out-of-State Students, and Tuition.”  Here’s an excerpt:

Since the 2008 recession, states have reduced spending on public higher education by 17 percent, while tuition has risen by 33 percent, according to a recent report by the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

The University of California system relied on state money for almost a quarter of its budget as recently as 2002, according to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Now, that figure is 9 percent, after $1 billion in cuts.

Students who once could afford high-quality educations at their state public universities now pay nearly twice what they used to pay, part of the driving force behind a $1.27 trillion student debt bill.

 

Read the full article on the The New York Times website.

UCLA, UC Berkeley boost admissions of Californians, including blacks and Latinos

The Los Angeles Times reported on July 6, 2016, that “UCLA, UC Berkeley boost admissions of Californians, including blacks and Latinos.”   Here’s an excerpt:

The University of California’s flagship campuses have significantly boosted admissions offers to state residents — including the most African Americans and Latinos since voters banned affirmative action two decades ago — officials announced Wednesday.

UCLA and UC Berkeley each admitted an additional 1,000 California freshman for fall 2016, increasing students from all ethnicities for an overall boost of more than 11%.

Both also made striking gains in increasing the number of underrepresented minorities, progress that is likely to ease pressure from state legislators to boost diversity at UC’s most elite campuses.

Read the full article on the Los Angeles Times website.

Diverse leadership at California State University

“The last five campus leaders picked at Cal State have been women, and recent hires have doubled the number of Asian-Americans who will be campus presidents,” Insider Higher Ed reported in an article “Diversifying the Presidency” on June 3, 2016.  Here’s an excerpt:

The California State University System has named women to lead campuses in five straight presidential searches in 2016, nearly doubling the number of women presidents at the 23-campus system in what some hope signals an accelerating trend toward diverse higher education leadership.

The latest hiring for the 475,000-student university system came May 25, when it named Ellen N. Junn the next president of California State University at Stanislaus. Junn is currently at Cal State Dominguez Hills, where she is provost and vice president for academic affairs. She will take over at Stanislaus State after President Joseph F. Sheley retires at the end of June.

Junn’s appointment comes after Cal State named four other women to presidential roles starting in January, three of whom will be replacing retiring male presidents. It also means the Cal State system will have women presidents at 11 of its 23 campuses. That’s a significant difference from the end of the 2014-15 academic year, when just six of its presidents were women.

Also of note is that Cal State will go into the next academic year with four Asian-American presidents, up from two last year. The change comes at a time when many Asian-Americans have worried they’re underrepresented in administrative ranks despite broad success in higher education. The Cal State system also has five Latino and three African-American presidents.

Read the complete article on the Inside Higher Ed website.

GOVERNOR’S REVISED BUDGET MAINTAINS HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING

Governor Jerry Brown has issued a revised 2016-17 Budget proposal that includes an additional $25 million each for the University of California and the California State University system to facilitate increased enrollment of California students.  The proposal did not include approximately $100 million in new funding requested by CSU.

“The Governor’s revised 2016-17 Budget proposal essentially maintains the status quo for higher education funding,” commented Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine, Co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education. “Even with an additional $25 million each for UC and CSU, this leaves State support well below historic levels.  Of immediate concern is the likelihood that insufficient State funding will force CSU to turn away thousands of qualified California students.”

Editorial: “Let’s keep perspective in fight over out-of-state students”

The Sacramento Bee published an editorial, “Let’s keep perspective in fight over out-of-state students,” on March 30, 2016, in response to a report from the state auditor charging that the university is admitting too many out-of-state students, to the detriment of Californians.  Here’s an excerpt:

Those are disturbing charges, if true, though like most of the audit, the UC vehemently disputes them. Admissions criteria, they say, have been made more “holistic” for all students, and the extra revenue from out-of-state fees actually subsidizes Californians whom they couldn’t afford to let in otherwise.

Gipson and company are right to look out for Californians. Out-of-state students shouldn’t be getting in with subpar grades and test scores, and in-state students who worked hard enough to make the cut shouldn’t be left with no choice other than the newbie campus, UC Merced, although there are worse fates.

But nonresident enrollment isn’t a bad thing; meeting out-of-state students is one reason in-state students want to go to any college. And last year’s power struggle shouldn’t be reignited just because some lawmaker might need an issue to run on.

Californians have some real decisions to make about how and whether to preserve this state’s system of public higher education – a costly line item that is among California’s greatest achievements.

Read the complete editorial on The Sacramento Bee’s website.

UC offers admission to 15% more Californians, particularly Latinos and African Americans

On April 4, 2016, the Los Angeles Times reported that “Admissions offers to California high school seniors increased by 8,488 to 66,123 — nearly a 15% increase over last year. Among them, offers to Latinos increased to 22,704 from 16,608 last year, while those to African Americans grew to 3,083 from 2,337 during the same time period.”

Read the article, “UC offers admission to 15% more Californians, particularly Latinos and African Americans”, on the LA Times website.

NEW POLL: Californians Recognize Importance of Public Higher Education

A new poll by the Public Policy Institute of California shows Californians’ overwhelming recognition of the importance of higher education:

In general, how important is California’s public higher education system to the quality of life and economic vitality of the state over the next 20 years?

  • Very Important: 80%
  • Somewhat Important: 14%
  • Not Too Important: 3%
  • Not important at all: 2%

Do you think that a college education is necessary for a person to be successful in today’s work world, or do you think that there are many ways to succeed in today’s work world without a college education?

  • College education is necessary to be successful: 59%
  • Succeed without a college education: 39%

The survey of 1,710 adult California residents was taken March 6-15, 2016.

New video: “The Future of Higher Education” event at UC Irvine

As the signature event of its 50th Anniversary Symposia, the University of California, Irvine convened prominent national experts for a thought-provoking conversation on the future of the public university. What might a top research campus look like in 2065 as opposed to now or 1965? How will new governance, technology and funding models change our vision of university communities? Watch the entire conversation as higher education leaders from across the U.S. joined UCI Chancellor Howard Gillman to discuss issues that affect all of us and coming generations.

Learn more about the event on the UCI website.

LA Times Editorial: “What’s next for Berkeley and UC?”

“What’s next for Berkeley and UC?” asks the Los Angeles Times Editorial Board. Here’s an excerpt of the Feb. 23, 2016 editorial:

The grand disagreement between Gov. Jerry Brown and University of California President Janet Napolitano has never been resolved. There have been some cease-fires, one showdown and a couple of deals struck. But the deeper argument remains: What sort of institution should the University of California be in the years ahead?

Will it continue to be the gem of the California public education system, admired and emulated throughout the world, or must it shrink its ambitions and its offerings as its state funding continues to decline? Can its most selective campuses continue to attract applications from the highest-achieving students in the nation and the world, and is that even desirable? Or should its undergraduate programs be reserved mostly for California residents? Will large numbers of students be funneled into massive online courses that are less educationally sound? Who is going to pay for the large and increasing numbers of low-income students who receive a full tuition ride to UC?

Read the complete editorial on the LA Times website.

Report: State spending per student at CSU and UC remains below pre-recession levels

A report from the California Budget & Policy Center shows that despite recent increases, state spending per student at CSU and UC remains below pre-recession levels:

chart

New poll shows strong support for stabilizing higher ed funding

On January 7, the Bay Area Council released results of a statewide poll that shows California voters want to put the brakes on decades of state funding cuts to higher education, with 63 percent of voters saying they would support a ballot initiative to guarantee stable funding for the University of California and California State University systems. The support far surpasses the simple majority that would be needed for passage.

Read the complete article, “New Poll Shows Strong Support for Stabilizing Higher Ed Funding”, on the Bay Area Council’s website.

UC seeks to boost Californians’ enrollment by 10,000 by 2018

On November 9, 2015, the Los Angeles Times reported that the University of California is seeking to boost Californians’ enrollment by 10,000 by 2018.  Here’s an excerpt from the article:

The plan would boost in-state enrollment of freshmen and transfer students by 5,000 next fall and then 2,500 more in each of the two following school years. The much-criticized increases in recent years in undergraduates from outside California would continue but at a slower pace, according to the proposal.

Read the complete article in the Los Angeles Times website.

Coalition leaders laud UC plan to admit more Californians

Statement on UC admissions increase, October 22, 2015:

“UC President Janet Napolitano’s announcement of a plan to increase admissions of California students is welcome news,” California Coalition for Public Higher Education Co-Chairs Dick Ackerman and Mel Levine commented. “The Legislature and Governor provided additional dollars to boost in state enrollment and the University is rising to the challenge. Tens of thousands of qualified California students can access our public higher education systems if decision-makers in Sacramento take further steps to restore State support for the UC, CSU and the community colleges.”

Statement from California Coalition for Public Higher Education co-chairs on the state budget agreement

Governor Jerry Brown,  Senate President pro Tempore Kevin De Leon and Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins have announced a 2015-16 budget agreement that includes an additional $97 million for CSU to increase enrollment and additional incentives for UC to expand enrollment of California students over the next two years.

CALIFORNIA COALITION FOR PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION CO-CHAIRS DICK ACKERMAN AND MEL LEVINE

STATEMENT ON STATE BUDGET AGREEMENT

“The Budget agreement reached between Governor Brown and the Legislative leadership represents another positive step toward restoring State support for the University of California, California State University system and our community colleges, there is still a long way to go to recover from many years of drastic cutbacks in State funding.   Our public higher education system is the engine of California’s future and we must fuel that engine.”

Video from the Senate floor: State budget and California higher ed

Take four minutes to watch Senator Hertzberg’s remarks on public higher education and the Budget Act of 2015, from the Senate floor on June 15, 2015:

Class of 2015 needs more than high school diploma, experts say

A June 8, 2015, article in the Daily News addresses the fact that “the high school diploma — once a ticket to the American middle class — isn’t enough any more.” Following is a excerpt from the article, with quotes from Pamela Clute, lecturer in education and mathematics and executive director of the Alpha Center at UC Riverside:

After graduation, students can obtain career technical skills at trade schools. The best thing graduates can do, though, is attend college.

“It is well-established that a Californian with a college degree will earn $1.3 million more than a Californian without one” over a lifetime, Clute said.

According to the U.S. Department of Labor, by 2020, 36 percent of jobs will require a bachelor’s degree and 30 percent will require an AA degree or a certificate.

“Postsecondary education is absolutely vital if you want a job that pays more than minimum wage,” Clute said. “There’s no other option today, if you want to make a good wage.”

Read the full article on the Daily News website.

CityWatch covers CCPHE-Education Fund event

CityWatch covered the California Coalition for Public Higher Education-Education Fund’s recent “Future of Public Higher Education in California” event featuring UC President Janet Napolitano, CSU Chancellor Timothy White and Glendale Community College President David Vlar in Beverly Hills on May 13.

Read more about the event here

Governor’s Revised Budget Provides More for Higher Education

When Governor Jerry Brown announced his May revision of the 2015-16 State Budget proposal, there was good news for public higher education campuses.  Community colleges will receive about $250 million in additional funding and the California State University system will receive an additional $38 million for operations plus another $35 million for energy improvements. The University of California will benefit from transfers to help meet unfunded pension liabilities–$96 million for 2015-16 and $170 million in each of the following two years.  UC tuition will be held at current levels for the next two years.

“The Governor’s revised Budget proposal marks a significant step forward in recognizing the critical importance of our public higher education system and providing increased financial stability for the University of California, the California State University system and our community colleges, while holding the line on tuition and fees,” commented Mel Levine and Dick Ackerman, co-chairs of the California Coalition for Public Higher Education.  “The next step must be to provide additional funding to allow our campuses to open their doors to more students, particularly qualified California applicants.”